hilos.io vs wa.link
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| hilos.io | wa.link | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 71.0K | 7.3M | wa.link |
| Bounce Rate | 17.9% | 72.3% | hilos.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 4y 10m | 6y 11m | wa.link |
wa.link leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while hilos.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| hilos.io | wa.link | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 71.0K | 7.3M | wa.link |
| MoM Change | -7% | +1% | wa.link |
| Avg. Session | 36m34s | 0m47s | hilos.io |
| Pages / Visit | 23.1 | 1.5 | hilos.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
hilos.io is losing traffic (-7%) despite 71.0K monthly visits. wa.link's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| hilos.io | wa.link | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 83% | Search 51% | |
| Bounce Rate | 17.9% | 72.3% | hilos.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | hilos.io | wa.link |
|---|---|---|---|
| link de whatsapp gratuito | 4.4K | #6 | #1 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
hilos.io acquires users primarily through Direct (83%), while wa.link relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hilos.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wa.link's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| hilos.io | wa.link | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 4y 10m | 6y 11m | wa.link |
| Registered | Oct 2021 | Sep 2019 | |
| Expires | Oct 2027 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
wa.link has been in the market 2 years longer (7y vs 5y). wa.link's longer track record suggests established operations, while hilos.io's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| hilos.io | wa.link | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #284.7K | #11.7K | wa.link |
| Category Rank | #155 | #70 | wa.link |
| PH Upvotes | — | 6 |
hilos.io only
wa.link only
Market Position · Insight
hilos.io is heavily concentrated in Colombia (89%), creating dependency risk on a single market. wa.link has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: hilos.io could expand into Brazil, India, while wa.link could target Argentina, United States.
Key Takeaways
- •hilos.io is losing traffic (-7%) despite 71.0K monthly visits. wa.link's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •hilos.io acquires users primarily through Direct (83%), while wa.link relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hilos.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wa.link's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •wa.link receives 102.8x more monthly traffic than hilos.io (7.3M vs 71.0K).
- •wa.link is growing (+1%) while hilos.io is declining (-7%).
- •hilos.io keeps visitors significantly longer (36m34s avg session vs wa.link's 0m47s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •hilos.io has a 54 percentage point lower bounce rate (18% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026