iloveimg.com vs tinypng.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| iloveimg.com | tinypng.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 37.2M | 2.4M | iloveimg.com |
| Bounce Rate | 31.5% | 68.2% | iloveimg.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 11y 9m | 15y 3m | tinypng.com |
iloveimg.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while tinypng.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| iloveimg.com | tinypng.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 37.2M | 2.4M | iloveimg.com |
| MoM Change | +7% | -4% | iloveimg.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m31s | 2m30s | iloveimg.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.9 | 1.5 | iloveimg.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tinypng.com is losing traffic (-4%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. iloveimg.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| iloveimg.com | tinypng.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 72% | Direct 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.5% | 68.2% | iloveimg.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 400%
| Keyword | Volume | iloveimg.com | tinypng.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| image compressor | 740.4K | #4 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
iloveimg.com acquires users primarily through Search (72%), while tinypng.com relies on Direct (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tinypng.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while iloveimg.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| iloveimg.com | tinypng.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 9m | 15y 3m | tinypng.com |
| Registered | Nov 2014 | May 2011 | |
| Expires | Nov 2027 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
tinypng.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| iloveimg.com | tinypng.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.3K | #34.0K | iloveimg.com |
| Category Rank | #7 | — |
iloveimg.com only
tinypng.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: iloveimg.com could expand into United States, China, while tinypng.com could target Brazil, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •tinypng.com is losing traffic (-4%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. iloveimg.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •iloveimg.com acquires users primarily through Search (72%), while tinypng.com relies on Direct (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tinypng.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while iloveimg.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •iloveimg.com receives 15.3x more monthly traffic than tinypng.com (37.2M vs 2.4M).
- •iloveimg.com is growing (+7%) while tinypng.com is declining (-4%).
- •iloveimg.com has a 37 percentage point lower bounce rate (31% vs 68%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •iloveimg.com acquires traffic primarily through Search (72%), while tinypng.com relies on Direct (74%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026