imaginex.video vs supermaker.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| imaginex.video | supermaker.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 257.0K | 182.0K | imaginex.video |
| Bounce Rate | 30.9% | 41.0% | imaginex.video |
| Domain Rating | — | 48 | |
| SEO & Keywords | 40 | 35 | imaginex.video |
| Domain Age | 1y 1m | 1y 4m | supermaker.ai |
imaginex.video leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while supermaker.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| imaginex.video | supermaker.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 257.0K | 182.0K | imaginex.video |
| MoM Change | +36% | -14% | imaginex.video |
| Avg. Session | 4m21s | 0m33s | imaginex.video |
| Pages / Visit | 6.0 | 2.1 | imaginex.video |
Growth Momentum · Insight
supermaker.ai is losing traffic (-14%) despite 182.0K monthly visits. imaginex.video's +36% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| imaginex.video | supermaker.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 73% | Direct 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 30.9% | 41.0% | imaginex.video |
| SEO & Keywords | 40 | 35 | imaginex.video |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 29%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
imaginex.video acquires users primarily through Direct (73%), while supermaker.ai relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — imaginex.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while supermaker.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| imaginex.video | supermaker.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 1m | 1y 4m | supermaker.ai |
| Registered | Aug 2025 | Apr 2025 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
Both are relatively new entrants in this market.
Market Position
| imaginex.video | supermaker.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | — | 48 | |
| Global Rank | #145.3K | #249.6K | imaginex.video |
| Category Rank | #109 | #1.5K | imaginex.video |
imaginex.video only
supermaker.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: imaginex.video could expand into Vietnam, India, while supermaker.ai could target South Korea, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •supermaker.ai is losing traffic (-14%) despite 182.0K monthly visits. imaginex.video's +36% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •imaginex.video acquires users primarily through Direct (73%), while supermaker.ai relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — imaginex.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while supermaker.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •imaginex.video has 1.4x more traffic (257.0K vs 182.0K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •imaginex.video is growing (+36%) while supermaker.ai is declining (-14%).
- •imaginex.video keeps visitors significantly longer (4m21s avg session vs supermaker.ai's 0m33s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •imaginex.video has a 10 percentage point lower bounce rate (31% vs 41%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026