improvado.io vs jedha.co
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| improvado.io | jedha.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 192.6K | 242.3K | jedha.co |
| Bounce Rate | 40.2% | 51.0% | improvado.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | improvado.io |
| Domain Age | 9y 11m | 8y 8m | improvado.io |
improvado.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while jedha.co leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| improvado.io | jedha.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 192.6K | 242.3K | jedha.co |
| MoM Change | -12% | -16% | improvado.io |
| Avg. Session | 0m51s | 1m44s | jedha.co |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 2.1 | jedha.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
jedha.co receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than improvado.io (242.3K vs 192.6K).
Acquisition Strategy
| improvado.io | jedha.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 39% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.2% | 51.0% | improvado.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | improvado.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
improvado.io acquires users primarily through Search (39%), while jedha.co relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — improvado.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jedha.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| improvado.io | jedha.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 11m | 8y 8m | improvado.io |
| Registered | Sep 2016 | Jan 2018 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
improvado.io has been in the market 1 years longer (10y vs 9y). improvado.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while jedha.co's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| improvado.io | jedha.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #251.3K | #198.8K | jedha.co |
| Category Rank | #752 | #188 | jedha.co |
Market Position · Insight
jedha.co is heavily concentrated in France (75%), creating dependency risk on a single market. improvado.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: improvado.io could expand into France, Belgium, Senegal, while jedha.co could target United States, United Arab Emirates, India.
Key Takeaways
- •jedha.co receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than improvado.io (242.3K vs 192.6K).
- •improvado.io acquires users primarily through Search (39%), while jedha.co relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — improvado.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jedha.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •jedha.co has 1.3x more traffic (242.3K vs 192.6K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •jedha.co keeps visitors significantly longer (1m44s avg session vs improvado.io's 0m51s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •improvado.io has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (40% vs 51%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 5% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026