invideo.io vs teamily.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| invideo.io | teamily.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 41.5K | invideo.io |
| Bounce Rate | 40.6% | 44.7% | invideo.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 10 | invideo.io |
| Domain Age | 9y 3m | 7m | invideo.io |
invideo.io leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while teamily.ai leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| invideo.io | teamily.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 41.5K | invideo.io |
| MoM Change | -2% | +117% | teamily.ai |
| Avg. Session | 2m15s | 2m07s | invideo.io |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 3.2 | invideo.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
invideo.io is losing traffic (-2%) despite 6.8M monthly visits. teamily.ai's +117% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| invideo.io | teamily.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 55% | Search 65% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.6% | 44.7% | invideo.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 10 | invideo.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 22%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
invideo.io acquires users primarily through Search (55%), while teamily.ai relies on Search (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — invideo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while teamily.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| invideo.io | teamily.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 3m | 7m | invideo.io |
| Registered | May 2017 | Jan 2026 | |
| Expires | May 2035 | Jan 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
invideo.io has a 9-year head start, but teamily.ai's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| invideo.io | teamily.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #6.4K | #647.7K | invideo.io |
| Category Rank | #29 | — | |
| PH Upvotes | — | 4 |
invideo.io only
teamily.ai only
Market Position · Insight
teamily.ai is heavily concentrated in India (49%), creating dependency risk on a single market. invideo.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: invideo.io could expand into Bangladesh, Germany, while teamily.ai could target Brazil, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •invideo.io is losing traffic (-2%) despite 6.8M monthly visits. teamily.ai's +117% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •invideo.io acquires users primarily through Search (55%), while teamily.ai relies on Search (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — invideo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while teamily.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •invideo.io receives 164.9x more monthly traffic than teamily.ai (6.8M vs 41.5K).
- •teamily.ai is growing (+117%) while invideo.io is declining (-2%).
- •They share 8 keywords (22% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •invideo.io has 3.5x more ranking keywords (35 vs 10), indicating broader SEO footprint.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026