iproyal.com vs lokiproxy.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| iproyal.com | lokiproxy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.7M | 131.2K | iproyal.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.6% | 33.5% | lokiproxy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | iproyal.com |
| Domain Age | 7y 10m | 11m | iproyal.com |
iproyal.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while lokiproxy.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| iproyal.com | lokiproxy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.7M | 131.2K | iproyal.com |
| MoM Change | -1% | +186% | lokiproxy.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m25s | 5m27s | lokiproxy.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.7 | 8.1 | lokiproxy.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
iproyal.com is losing traffic (-1%) despite 1.7M monthly visits. lokiproxy.com's +186% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| iproyal.com | lokiproxy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 55% | Direct 56% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.6% | 33.5% | lokiproxy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | iproyal.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 317%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
iproyal.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while lokiproxy.com relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — lokiproxy.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lokiproxy.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| iproyal.com | lokiproxy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 7y 10m | 11m | iproyal.com |
| Registered | Nov 2018 | Sep 2025 | |
| Expires | Nov 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
iproyal.com has a 7-year head start, but lokiproxy.com's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| iproyal.com | lokiproxy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #32.8K | #213.0K | iproyal.com |
| Category Rank | #81 | — | |
| PH Upvotes | — | 7 |
iproyal.com only
lokiproxy.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: iproyal.com could expand into Bangladesh, Vietnam, while lokiproxy.com could target Pakistan, Kenya.
Key Takeaways
- •iproyal.com is losing traffic (-1%) despite 1.7M monthly visits. lokiproxy.com's +186% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •iproyal.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while lokiproxy.com relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — lokiproxy.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lokiproxy.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •iproyal.com receives 12.7x more monthly traffic than lokiproxy.com (1.7M vs 131.2K).
- •lokiproxy.com is growing (+186%) while iproyal.com is declining (-1%).
- •lokiproxy.com keeps visitors significantly longer (5m27s avg session vs iproyal.com's 3m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 38 keywords (317% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026