jobbie.io vs scale.jobs
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| jobbie.io | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 69.5K | 274.2K | scale.jobs |
| Bounce Rate | 45.1% | 32.3% | scale.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | jobbie.io |
| Domain Age | 2y 1m | 2y 9m | scale.jobs |
scale.jobs leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while jobbie.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| jobbie.io | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 69.5K | 274.2K | scale.jobs |
| MoM Change | -8% | +30% | scale.jobs |
| Avg. Session | 0m30s | 6m47s | scale.jobs |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 8.0 | scale.jobs |
Growth Momentum · Insight
jobbie.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 69.5K monthly visits. scale.jobs's +30% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| jobbie.io | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Direct 67% | |
| Bounce Rate | 45.1% | 32.3% | scale.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | jobbie.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
jobbie.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while scale.jobs relies on Direct (67%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scale.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jobbie.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| jobbie.io | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 1m | 2y 9m | scale.jobs |
| Registered | Jul 2024 | Nov 2023 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
scale.jobs has been in the market 1 years longer (3y vs 2y). scale.jobs's longer track record suggests established operations, while jobbie.io's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| jobbie.io | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #579.2K | #126.8K | scale.jobs |
| Category Rank | #1.2K | #344 | scale.jobs |
| PH Upvotes | 18 | — |
jobbie.io only
scale.jobs only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: jobbie.io could expand into Nigeria, Pakistan, while scale.jobs could target Germany, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •jobbie.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 69.5K monthly visits. scale.jobs's +30% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •jobbie.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while scale.jobs relies on Direct (67%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scale.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jobbie.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •scale.jobs receives 3.9x more monthly traffic than jobbie.io (274.2K vs 69.5K).
- •scale.jobs is growing (+30%) while jobbie.io is declining (-8%).
- •scale.jobs keeps visitors significantly longer (6m47s avg session vs jobbie.io's 0m30s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •scale.jobs has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (32% vs 45%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026