jstor.org vs tamu.edu
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| jstor.org | tamu.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 9.4M | 6.2M | jstor.org |
| Bounce Rate | 47.2% | 36.2% | tamu.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y 6m | — |
jstor.org leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while tamu.edu leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| jstor.org | tamu.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 9.4M | 6.2M | jstor.org |
| MoM Change | -10% | +14% | tamu.edu |
| Avg. Session | 3m32s | 5m05s | tamu.edu |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 6.1 | tamu.edu |
Growth Momentum · Insight
jstor.org is losing traffic (-10%) despite 9.4M monthly visits. tamu.edu's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| jstor.org | tamu.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 58% | Direct 41% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.2% | 36.2% | tamu.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 11%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
jstor.org acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while tamu.edu relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tamu.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jstor.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| jstor.org | tamu.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 6m | — | |
| Registered | Feb 1996 | — | |
| Expires | Feb 2031 | — |
Market Position
| jstor.org | tamu.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #4.8K | #7.9K | jstor.org |
| Category Rank | #4 | #33 | jstor.org |
jstor.org only
tamu.edu only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: jstor.org could expand into Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, while tamu.edu could target United Kingdom, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •jstor.org is losing traffic (-10%) despite 9.4M monthly visits. tamu.edu's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •jstor.org acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while tamu.edu relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tamu.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while jstor.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •jstor.org has 1.5x more traffic (9.4M vs 6.2M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •tamu.edu is growing (+14%) while jstor.org is declining (-10%).
- •tamu.edu has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (36% vs 47%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •jstor.org acquires traffic primarily through Search (58%), while tamu.edu relies on Direct (41%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026