laminar.sh vs runlaminar.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| laminar.sh | runlaminar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.7K | 10.1K | laminar.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 34.6% | runlaminar.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y | 11m | laminar.sh |
laminar.sh leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while runlaminar.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| laminar.sh | runlaminar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.7K | 10.1K | laminar.sh |
| MoM Change | +3% | +26% | runlaminar.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m14s | 2m10s | runlaminar.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.5 | 2.4 | laminar.sh |
Growth Momentum · Insight
runlaminar.com is growing +26% while laminar.sh grows +3%. At current trajectory, runlaminar.com could close the traffic gap within 15 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| laminar.sh | runlaminar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 69% | Search 76% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 34.6% | runlaminar.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 233%
| Keyword | Volume | laminar.sh | runlaminar.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| laminar | 11.1K | #1 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
laminar.sh acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while runlaminar.com relies on Search (76%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — laminar.sh's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runlaminar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| laminar.sh | runlaminar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y | 11m | laminar.sh |
| Registered | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 | |
| Expires | Aug 2027 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
Both are relatively new entrants in this market.
Market Position
| laminar.sh | runlaminar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #739.9K | #2.0M | laminar.sh |
laminar.sh only
Key Takeaways
- •runlaminar.com is growing +26% while laminar.sh grows +3%. At current trajectory, runlaminar.com could close the traffic gap within 15 months.
- •laminar.sh acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while runlaminar.com relies on Search (76%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — laminar.sh's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runlaminar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •laminar.sh receives 3.4x more monthly traffic than runlaminar.com (34.7K vs 10.1K).
- •Both are growing, with runlaminar.com accelerating faster at +26% vs +3%.
- •runlaminar.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m10s avg session vs laminar.sh's 1m14s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •laminar.sh acquires traffic primarily through Direct (69%), while runlaminar.com relies on Search (76%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026