layers.to vs peerlist.io

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

layers.to faviconlayers.to
VS
peerlist.io faviconpeerlist.io
 layers.topeerlist.ioLeads
Monthly Visits164.7K533.3Kpeerlist.io
Bounce Rate40.8%42.0%layers.to
SEO & Keywords3030Tie
Domain Age4y 5m6y 5mpeerlist.io

peerlist.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while layers.to leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
layers.topeerlist.io
 layers.topeerlist.ioLeads
Monthly Visits164.7K533.3Kpeerlist.io
MoM Change-24%+18%peerlist.io
Avg. Session0m54s1m21speerlist.io
Pages / Visit3.23.2layers.to

Growth Momentum · Insight

layers.to is losing traffic (-24%) despite 164.7K monthly visits. peerlist.io's +18% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.

Acquisition Strategy

 layers.topeerlist.ioLeads
Primary ChannelDirect 54%Search 42%
Bounce Rate40.8%42.0%layers.to
SEO & Keywords3030
layers.to
Search 21%Direct 54%Social 13%Referral 11%Email 1%
peerlist.io
Search 42%Direct 41%Social 8%Referral 7%Email 2%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
44
layers.to OnlySharedpeerlist.io Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 275%

KeywordVolumelayers.topeerlist.io
square face generator54.9K#10#5

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

layers.to acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while peerlist.io relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — layers.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while peerlist.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 layers.topeerlist.ioLeads
Domain Age4y 5m6y 5mpeerlist.io
RegisteredMar 2022Apr 2020
ExpiresMar 2027Apr 2028

Business Maturity · Insight

peerlist.io has been in the market 2 years longer (6y vs 4y). peerlist.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while layers.to's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.

Market Position

 layers.topeerlist.ioLeads
Global Rank#228.9K#90.9Kpeerlist.io
Category Rank#3.0K#364peerlist.io
layers.topeerlist.io
🇮🇳 India
12%
31%
🇺🇸 United States
9%
10%
🌐 Nigeria
7%
5%
🇧🇷 Brazil
5%
2%

layers.to only

🌐 Pakistan 5%

peerlist.io only

🇦🇺 Australia 2%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: layers.to could expand into Australia, while peerlist.io could target Pakistan.

Key Takeaways

  • layers.to is losing traffic (-24%) despite 164.7K monthly visits. peerlist.io's +18% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
  • layers.to acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while peerlist.io relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — layers.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while peerlist.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • peerlist.io receives 3.2x more monthly traffic than layers.to (533.3K vs 164.7K).
  • peerlist.io is growing (+18%) while layers.to is declining (-24%).
  • layers.to acquires traffic primarily through Direct (54%), while peerlist.io relies on Search (42%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
  • They share 44 keywords (275% overlap), indicating direct search competition.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026