lensa.com vs simplyhired.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| lensa.com | simplyhired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.8M | 3.7M | lensa.com |
| Bounce Rate | 52.0% | 44.3% | simplyhired.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | lensa.com |
| Domain Age | 25y 4m | 22y 5m | lensa.com |
lensa.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while simplyhired.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| lensa.com | simplyhired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.8M | 3.7M | lensa.com |
| MoM Change | +12% | +10% | lensa.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m12s | 4m28s | simplyhired.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 5.0 | simplyhired.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
lensa.com receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than simplyhired.com (8.8M vs 3.7M).
Acquisition Strategy
| lensa.com | simplyhired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 34% | Search 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 52.0% | 44.3% | simplyhired.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | lensa.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
lensa.com acquires users primarily through Direct (34%), while simplyhired.com relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — simplyhired.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while simplyhired.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| lensa.com | simplyhired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 4m | 22y 5m | lensa.com |
| Registered | Apr 2001 | Mar 2004 | |
| Expires | Apr 2032 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
lensa.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| lensa.com | simplyhired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #7.7K | #12.7K | lensa.com |
| Category Rank | #15 | #36 | lensa.com |
lensa.com only
simplyhired.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: lensa.com could expand into South Africa, Philippines, Nigeria, while simplyhired.com could target Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •lensa.com receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than simplyhired.com (8.8M vs 3.7M).
- •lensa.com acquires users primarily through Direct (34%), while simplyhired.com relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — simplyhired.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while simplyhired.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •lensa.com receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than simplyhired.com (8.8M vs 3.7M).
- •simplyhired.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m28s avg session vs lensa.com's 2m12s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •lensa.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (34%), while simplyhired.com relies on Search (52%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 10 keywords (20% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026