linktr.ee vs tr.ee
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| linktr.ee | tr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 205.6M | 3.3M | linktr.ee |
| Bounce Rate | 70.0% | 70.1% | linktr.ee |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | linktr.ee |
| Domain Age | 10y 6m | 16y 2m | tr.ee |
linktr.ee leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while tr.ee leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| linktr.ee | tr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 205.6M | 3.3M | linktr.ee |
| MoM Change | +7% | +12% | tr.ee |
| Avg. Session | 1m21s | 0m42s | linktr.ee |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 1.6 | linktr.ee |
Growth Momentum · Insight
linktr.ee receives 61.4x more monthly traffic than tr.ee (205.6M vs 3.3M).
Acquisition Strategy
| linktr.ee | tr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 26% | Direct 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 70.0% | 70.1% | linktr.ee |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | linktr.ee |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 92%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
linktr.ee acquires users primarily through Direct (26%), while tr.ee relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tr.ee's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tr.ee's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| linktr.ee | tr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 6m | 16y 2m | tr.ee |
| Registered | Mar 2016 | Jul 2010 |
Business Maturity · Insight
tr.ee has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| linktr.ee | tr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #257 | #23.4K | linktr.ee |
| Category Rank | #1 | #113 | linktr.ee |
| PH Upvotes | 113 | 11 | linktr.ee |
linktr.ee only
tr.ee only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: linktr.ee could expand into India, Egypt, while tr.ee could target United Kingdom, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •linktr.ee receives 61.4x more monthly traffic than tr.ee (205.6M vs 3.3M).
- •linktr.ee acquires users primarily through Direct (26%), while tr.ee relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tr.ee's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tr.ee's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •linktr.ee receives 61.4x more monthly traffic than tr.ee (205.6M vs 3.3M).
- •linktr.ee keeps visitors significantly longer (1m21s avg session vs tr.ee's 0m42s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •linktr.ee acquires traffic primarily through Social (57%), while tr.ee relies on Direct (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 24 keywords (92% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026