ltx.io vs ltx.video
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ltx.io | ltx.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 897.4K | 139.4K | ltx.io |
| Bounce Rate | 46.8% | 35.0% | ltx.video |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | ltx.video |
| Domain Age | 7y 4m | 1y 8m | ltx.io |
ltx.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while ltx.video leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| ltx.io | ltx.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 897.4K | 139.4K | ltx.io |
| MoM Change | +6% | -20% | ltx.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m07s | 1m22s | ltx.video |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 3.9 | ltx.video |
Growth Momentum · Insight
ltx.io is growing faster (+6%) but visitors stay 1.2x shorter (1m07s vs 1m22s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| ltx.io | ltx.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 58% | Direct 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 46.8% | 35.0% | ltx.video |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | ltx.video |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 91%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ltx.io acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while ltx.video relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ltx.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ltx.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ltx.io | ltx.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 7y 4m | 1y 8m | ltx.io |
| Registered | Apr 2019 | Dec 2024 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ltx.io has a 6-year head start, but ltx.video's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| ltx.io | ltx.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #65.5K | #240.7K | ltx.io |
| Category Rank | #79 | #1.3K | ltx.io |
| PH Upvotes | 125 | — |
ltx.io only
ltx.video only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ltx.io could expand into Spain, while ltx.video could target China.
Key Takeaways
- •ltx.video is losing traffic (-20%) despite 139.4K monthly visits. ltx.io's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •ltx.io is growing faster (+6%) but visitors stay 1.2x shorter (1m07s vs 1m22s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •ltx.io acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while ltx.video relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ltx.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ltx.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ltx.io receives 6.4x more monthly traffic than ltx.video (897.4K vs 139.4K).
- •ltx.io is growing (+6%) while ltx.video is declining (-20%).
- •ltx.video has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 47%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026