mastra.ai vs opencode.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| mastra.ai | opencode.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 362.9K | 11.6M | opencode.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 42.5% | 38.9% | opencode.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y 11m | 3y 9m | opencode.ai |
opencode.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while mastra.ai leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| mastra.ai | opencode.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 362.9K | 11.6M | opencode.ai |
| MoM Change | +17% | +7% | mastra.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m21s | 4m21s | opencode.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 4.1 | opencode.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mastra.ai is growing faster (+17%) but visitors stay 3.2x shorter (1m21s vs 4m21s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| mastra.ai | opencode.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 44% | Direct 51% | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.5% | 38.9% | opencode.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 500%
| Keyword | Volume | mastra.ai | opencode.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| big pickle ai | 1.7K | #7 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
mastra.ai acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while opencode.ai relies on Direct (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opencode.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mastra.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| mastra.ai | opencode.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 11m | 3y 9m | opencode.ai |
| Registered | Oct 2024 | Dec 2022 | |
| Expires | Oct 2026 | Dec 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
opencode.ai has been in the market 2 years longer (4y vs 2y). opencode.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while mastra.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| mastra.ai | opencode.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #134.8K | #5.1K | opencode.ai |
| Category Rank | #732 | — | |
| PH Upvotes | 205 | 390 | opencode.ai |
mastra.ai only
opencode.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: mastra.ai could expand into Brazil, Indonesia, while opencode.ai could target Vietnam, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •mastra.ai is growing +17% while opencode.ai grows +7%. At current trajectory, mastra.ai could close the traffic gap within 15 months.
- •mastra.ai is growing faster (+17%) but visitors stay 3.2x shorter (1m21s vs 4m21s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •mastra.ai acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while opencode.ai relies on Direct (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opencode.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mastra.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •opencode.ai receives 32.0x more monthly traffic than mastra.ai (11.6M vs 362.9K).
- •Both are growing, with mastra.ai accelerating faster at +17% vs +7%.
- •opencode.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (4m21s avg session vs mastra.ai's 1m21s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026