math-gpt.ai vs math-gpt.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 259.6K | 1.5M | math-gpt.org |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 45.6% | math-gpt.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y 9m | 3y 1m | math-gpt.org |
math-gpt.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while math-gpt.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 259.6K | 1.5M | math-gpt.org |
| MoM Change | -30% | -35% | math-gpt.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m21s | 3m36s | math-gpt.org |
| Pages / Visit | 4.4 | 3.2 | math-gpt.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
math-gpt.org receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than math-gpt.ai (1.5M vs 259.6K).
Acquisition Strategy
| math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 49% | Direct 59% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 45.6% | math-gpt.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org |
|---|---|---|---|
| math solver | 281.1K | #10 | #1 |
| mathgpt | 233.9K | #3 | #1 |
| math ai | 149.6K | #4 | #2 |
| math gpt | 111.4K | #2 | #1 |
| ai math solver | 19.1K | #4 | #1 |
| mathsgpt | 15.7K | #2 | #1 |
| math ai solver | 15.5K | #4 | #1 |
| maths ai | 13.4K | #6 | #1 |
| math solver ai | 7.4K | #4 | #1 |
| photomath online | 5.6K | #7 | #8 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
math-gpt.ai acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while math-gpt.org relies on Direct (59%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — math-gpt.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while math-gpt.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 9m | 3y 1m | math-gpt.org |
| Registered | Dec 2024 | Aug 2023 | |
| Expires | Dec 2026 | Aug 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
math-gpt.org has been in the market 1 years longer (3y vs 2y). math-gpt.org's longer track record suggests established operations, while math-gpt.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| math-gpt.ai | math-gpt.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #142.6K | #40.0K | math-gpt.org |
| Category Rank | — | #20 |
math-gpt.ai only
math-gpt.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: math-gpt.ai could expand into Australia, Philippines, United Kingdom, while math-gpt.org could target Canada, Germany, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •math-gpt.org receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than math-gpt.ai (1.5M vs 259.6K).
- •math-gpt.ai acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while math-gpt.org relies on Direct (59%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — math-gpt.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while math-gpt.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •math-gpt.org receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than math-gpt.ai (1.5M vs 259.6K).
- •math-gpt.org keeps visitors significantly longer (3m36s avg session vs math-gpt.ai's 1m21s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •math-gpt.ai acquires traffic primarily through Search (49%), while math-gpt.org relies on Direct (59%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026