mathpix.com vs underleaf.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| mathpix.com | underleaf.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 385.5K | 180.9K | mathpix.com |
| Bounce Rate | 36.9% | 43.0% | mathpix.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | mathpix.com |
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 2y 3m | mathpix.com |
mathpix.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while underleaf.ai leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| mathpix.com | underleaf.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 385.5K | 180.9K | mathpix.com |
| MoM Change | -9% | +7% | underleaf.ai |
| Avg. Session | 3m14s | 0m38s | mathpix.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.6 | 2.0 | mathpix.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
underleaf.ai is growing faster (+7%) but visitors stay 5.2x shorter (0m38s vs 3m14s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| mathpix.com | underleaf.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 55% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 36.9% | 43.0% | mathpix.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | mathpix.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 97%
| Keyword | Volume | mathpix.com | underleaf.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| image to latex | 2.3K | #1 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
mathpix.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while underleaf.ai relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — mathpix.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while underleaf.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| mathpix.com | underleaf.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 2y 3m | mathpix.com |
| Registered | Jul 2015 | May 2024 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
mathpix.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| mathpix.com | underleaf.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #96.3K | #253.2K | mathpix.com |
| Category Rank | #22 | #142 | mathpix.com |
mathpix.com only
underleaf.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: mathpix.com could expand into Germany, Canada, while underleaf.ai could target Indonesia, Peru.
Key Takeaways
- •mathpix.com is losing traffic (-9%) despite 385.5K monthly visits. underleaf.ai's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •underleaf.ai is growing faster (+7%) but visitors stay 5.2x shorter (0m38s vs 3m14s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •mathpix.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while underleaf.ai relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — mathpix.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while underleaf.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •mathpix.com receives 2.1x more monthly traffic than underleaf.ai (385.5K vs 180.9K).
- •underleaf.ai is growing (+7%) while mathpix.com is declining (-9%).
- •mathpix.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m14s avg session vs underleaf.ai's 0m38s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026