medeo.app vs seaart.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| medeo.app | seaart.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 236.2K | 17.4M | seaart.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 40.0% | 36.6% | seaart.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | medeo.app |
| Domain Age | 1y 6m | 3y 5m | seaart.ai |
seaart.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while medeo.app leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| medeo.app | seaart.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 236.2K | 17.4M | seaart.ai |
| MoM Change | -25% | +3% | seaart.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m22s | 10m50s | seaart.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 3.3 | 11.0 | seaart.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
medeo.app is losing traffic (-25%) despite 236.2K monthly visits. seaart.ai's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| medeo.app | seaart.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 61% | Direct 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.0% | 36.6% | seaart.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | medeo.app |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 10%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
medeo.app acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while seaart.ai relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — seaart.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while medeo.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| medeo.app | seaart.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 6m | 3y 5m | seaart.ai |
| Registered | Mar 2025 | Mar 2023 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
seaart.ai has been in the market 2 years longer (3y vs 1y). seaart.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while medeo.app's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| medeo.app | seaart.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #170.8K | #1.9K | seaart.ai |
| Category Rank | #391 | #7 | seaart.ai |
medeo.app only
seaart.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: medeo.app could expand into Japan, Russia, Mexico, while seaart.ai could target China, India, Taiwan.
Key Takeaways
- •medeo.app is losing traffic (-25%) despite 236.2K monthly visits. seaart.ai's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •medeo.app acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while seaart.ai relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — seaart.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while medeo.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •seaart.ai receives 73.8x more monthly traffic than medeo.app (17.4M vs 236.2K).
- •seaart.ai is growing (+3%) while medeo.app is declining (-25%).
- •seaart.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (10m50s avg session vs medeo.app's 1m22s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •medeo.app acquires traffic primarily through Search (61%), while seaart.ai relies on Direct (62%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026