missav.ws vs weblio.jp
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| missav.ws | weblio.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 160.1M | 12.0M | missav.ws |
| Bounce Rate | 18.0% | 57.1% | missav.ws |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | missav.ws |
missav.ws leads in 3 of 3 dimensions, while weblio.jp leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| missav.ws | weblio.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 160.1M | 12.0M | missav.ws |
| MoM Change | +8% | -4% | missav.ws |
| Avg. Session | 12m10s | 2m59s | missav.ws |
| Pages / Visit | 20.6 | 2.4 | missav.ws |
Growth Momentum · Insight
weblio.jp is losing traffic (-4%) despite 12.0M monthly visits. missav.ws's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| missav.ws | weblio.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 57% | Search 75% | |
| Bounce Rate | 18.0% | 57.1% | missav.ws |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | missav.ws |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 34%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
missav.ws acquires users primarily through Direct (57%), while weblio.jp relies on Search (75%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — missav.ws's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while weblio.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Market Position
| missav.ws | weblio.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #96 | #5.7K | missav.ws |
| Category Rank | #1 | #3 | missav.ws |
missav.ws only
weblio.jp only
Market Position · Insight
weblio.jp is heavily concentrated in Japan (90%), creating dependency risk on a single market. missav.ws has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: missav.ws could expand into Philippines, while weblio.jp could target Hong Kong SAR China.
Key Takeaways
- •weblio.jp is losing traffic (-4%) despite 12.0M monthly visits. missav.ws's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •missav.ws acquires users primarily through Direct (57%), while weblio.jp relies on Search (75%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — missav.ws's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while weblio.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •missav.ws receives 13.3x more monthly traffic than weblio.jp (160.1M vs 12.0M).
- •missav.ws is growing (+8%) while weblio.jp is declining (-4%).
- •missav.ws keeps visitors significantly longer (12m10s avg session vs weblio.jp's 2m59s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •missav.ws has a 39 percentage point lower bounce rate (18% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026