mobile-gpt.io vs whatgpt.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| mobile-gpt.io | whatgpt.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0K | 562 | mobile-gpt.io |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 37.9% | whatgpt.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 22 | mobile-gpt.io |
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 3y 6m | mobile-gpt.io |
mobile-gpt.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while whatgpt.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| mobile-gpt.io | whatgpt.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0K | 562 | mobile-gpt.io |
| MoM Change | +385% | -82% | mobile-gpt.io |
| Avg. Session | 0m16s | 0m32s | whatgpt.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 1.7 | whatgpt.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mobile-gpt.io is growing faster (+385%) but visitors stay 2.0x shorter (0m16s vs 0m32s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| mobile-gpt.io | whatgpt.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | — | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 37.9% | whatgpt.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 22 | mobile-gpt.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 21%
Business Maturity
| mobile-gpt.io | whatgpt.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 3y 6m | mobile-gpt.io |
| Registered | Feb 2023 | Mar 2023 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
mobile-gpt.io has been in the market 0 years longer (4y vs 3y). mobile-gpt.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while whatgpt.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| mobile-gpt.io | whatgpt.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.1M | #5.6M | whatgpt.ai |
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: mobile-gpt.io could expand into Brazil, United States, Türkiye, while whatgpt.ai could target India, Pakistan.
Key Takeaways
- •whatgpt.ai is losing traffic (-82%) despite 562 monthly visits. mobile-gpt.io's +385% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •mobile-gpt.io is growing faster (+385%) but visitors stay 2.0x shorter (0m16s vs 0m32s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •mobile-gpt.io receives 3.5x more monthly traffic than whatgpt.ai (2.0K vs 562).
- •mobile-gpt.io is growing (+385%) while whatgpt.ai is declining (-82%).
- •whatgpt.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (0m32s avg session vs mobile-gpt.io's 0m16s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 10 keywords (21% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026