nintendo.co.jp vs nintendo.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| nintendo.co.jp | nintendo.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.5M | 64.4M | nintendo.com |
| Bounce Rate | 47.8% | 36.8% | nintendo.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | — | 31y 7m |
nintendo.com leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while nintendo.co.jp leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| nintendo.co.jp | nintendo.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.5M | 64.4M | nintendo.com |
| MoM Change | -7% | -8% | nintendo.co.jp |
| Avg. Session | 4m27s | 3m33s | nintendo.co.jp |
| Pages / Visit | 4.0 | 5.1 | nintendo.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
nintendo.com receives 43.9x more monthly traffic than nintendo.co.jp (64.4M vs 1.5M).
Acquisition Strategy
| nintendo.co.jp | nintendo.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 48% | Search 48% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.8% | 36.8% | nintendo.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 36%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
nintendo.co.jp acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while nintendo.com relies on Search (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — nintendo.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while nintendo.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| nintendo.co.jp | nintendo.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 31y 7m | |
| Registered | — | Jan 1995 | |
| Expires | — | Jan 2028 |
Market Position
| nintendo.co.jp | nintendo.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #34.4K | #543 | nintendo.com |
| Category Rank | #71 | #12 | nintendo.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 6 |
nintendo.co.jp only
nintendo.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: nintendo.co.jp could expand into Germany, Brazil, while nintendo.com could target South Korea, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •nintendo.com receives 43.9x more monthly traffic than nintendo.co.jp (64.4M vs 1.5M).
- •nintendo.co.jp acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while nintendo.com relies on Search (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — nintendo.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while nintendo.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •nintendo.com receives 43.9x more monthly traffic than nintendo.co.jp (64.4M vs 1.5M).
- •nintendo.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (37% vs 48%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 16 keywords (36% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026