OpenInbox.io vs temp-mail.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 97.9K | 516.3K | temp-mail.app |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 47.2% | OpenInbox.io |
| Est. MRR | $235 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 10 | OpenInbox.io |
| Domain Age | 7m | 1y 2m | temp-mail.app |
OpenInbox.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while temp-mail.app leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 97.9K | 516.3K | temp-mail.app |
| MoM Change | +323% | +67% | OpenInbox.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m49s | 1m01s | OpenInbox.io |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 2.1 | OpenInbox.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
OpenInbox.io is growing +323% while temp-mail.app grows +67%. At current trajectory, OpenInbox.io could close the traffic gap within 14 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 57% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 47.2% | OpenInbox.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 10 | OpenInbox.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 39%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
OpenInbox.io acquires users primarily through Search (57%), while temp-mail.app relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — OpenInbox.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while temp-mail.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | $235 | — | |
| Revenue / Visit | $0.002 | — | |
| Domain Age | 7m | 1y 2m | temp-mail.app |
| Registered | Jan 2026 | Jun 2025 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
OpenInbox.io has reached $235 MRR in 1 years while temp-mail.app shows no public revenue data after 1 years — suggesting different monetization maturity or disclosure strategies.
Market Position
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #370.8K | #105.4K | temp-mail.app |
| Category Rank | — | #315 | |
| PH Upvotes | 3 | 0 | OpenInbox.io |
OpenInbox.io only
temp-mail.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: OpenInbox.io could expand into United Kingdom, Brazil, Vietnam, while temp-mail.app could target Ukraine, Indonesia, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •OpenInbox.io is growing +323% while temp-mail.app grows +67%. At current trajectory, OpenInbox.io could close the traffic gap within 14 months.
- •OpenInbox.io acquires users primarily through Search (57%), while temp-mail.app relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — OpenInbox.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while temp-mail.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •temp-mail.app receives 5.3x more monthly traffic than OpenInbox.io (516.3K vs 97.9K).
- •Both are growing, with OpenInbox.io accelerating faster at +323% vs +67%.
- •OpenInbox.io keeps visitors significantly longer (1m49s avg session vs temp-mail.app's 1m01s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 11 keywords (39% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026