OpenInbox.io vs temp-mail.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 97.9K | 1.8M | temp-mail.io |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 53.8% | OpenInbox.io |
| Est. MRR | $235 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 30 | temp-mail.io |
| Domain Age | 7m | 7y 9m | temp-mail.io |
temp-mail.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while OpenInbox.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 97.9K | 1.8M | temp-mail.io |
| MoM Change | +323% | -6% | OpenInbox.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m49s | 2m45s | temp-mail.io |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 2.5 | OpenInbox.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
OpenInbox.io is growing faster (+323%) but visitors stay 1.5x shorter (1m49s vs 2m45s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 57% | Search 57% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 53.8% | OpenInbox.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 30 | temp-mail.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 247%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
OpenInbox.io acquires users primarily through Search (57%), while temp-mail.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — OpenInbox.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while OpenInbox.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | $235 | — | |
| Revenue / Visit | $0.002 | — | |
| Domain Age | 7m | 7y 9m | temp-mail.io |
| Registered | Jan 2026 | Nov 2018 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
OpenInbox.io has reached $235 MRR in 1 years while temp-mail.io shows no public revenue data after 8 years — suggesting different monetization maturity or disclosure strategies.
Market Position
| OpenInbox.io | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #370.8K | #35.6K | temp-mail.io |
| Category Rank | — | #31 | |
| PH Upvotes | 3 | — |
OpenInbox.io only
temp-mail.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: OpenInbox.io could expand into Pakistan, France, Mexico, while temp-mail.io could target Ukraine, Indonesia, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •temp-mail.io is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.8M monthly visits. OpenInbox.io's +323% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •OpenInbox.io is growing faster (+323%) but visitors stay 1.5x shorter (1m49s vs 2m45s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •OpenInbox.io acquires users primarily through Search (57%), while temp-mail.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — OpenInbox.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while OpenInbox.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •temp-mail.io receives 18.0x more monthly traffic than OpenInbox.io (1.8M vs 97.9K).
- •OpenInbox.io is growing (+323%) while temp-mail.io is declining (-6%).
- •temp-mail.io keeps visitors significantly longer (2m45s avg session vs OpenInbox.io's 1m49s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026