opera.com vs techcrunch.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| opera.com | techcrunch.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 86.9M | 9.0M | opera.com |
| Bounce Rate | 60.4% | 64.0% | opera.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 4m | 21y 2m | opera.com |
opera.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while techcrunch.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| opera.com | techcrunch.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 86.9M | 9.0M | opera.com |
| MoM Change | +9% | +8% | opera.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m22s | 1m16s | opera.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 1.7 | opera.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
opera.com receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than techcrunch.com (86.9M vs 9.0M).
Acquisition Strategy
| opera.com | techcrunch.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 64% | Direct 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 60.4% | 64.0% | opera.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 6%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
opera.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while techcrunch.com relies on Direct (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opera.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while techcrunch.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| opera.com | techcrunch.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 4m | 21y 2m | opera.com |
| Registered | Apr 1999 | Jun 2005 | |
| Expires | Apr 2026 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
opera.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| opera.com | techcrunch.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #701 | #9.0K | opera.com |
| Category Rank | #23 | #107 | opera.com |
| PH Upvotes | 365 | — |
opera.com only
techcrunch.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: opera.com could expand into Canada, Germany, while techcrunch.com could target Brazil, France.
Key Takeaways
- •opera.com receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than techcrunch.com (86.9M vs 9.0M).
- •opera.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while techcrunch.com relies on Direct (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opera.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while techcrunch.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •opera.com receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than techcrunch.com (86.9M vs 9.0M).
- •opera.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m22s avg session vs techcrunch.com's 1m16s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •With only 6% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •opera.com has a 6-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026