parliament.uk vs weforum.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| parliament.uk | weforum.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.0M | 2.1M | parliament.uk |
| Bounce Rate | 59.7% | 66.5% | parliament.uk |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
parliament.uk leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while weforum.org leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| parliament.uk | weforum.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.0M | 2.1M | parliament.uk |
| MoM Change | -22% | -6% | weforum.org |
| Avg. Session | 1m59s | 1m02s | parliament.uk |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 1.9 | parliament.uk |
Growth Momentum · Insight
weforum.org is growing faster (-6%) but visitors stay 1.9x shorter (1m02s vs 1m59s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| parliament.uk | weforum.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 56% | Search 51% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.7% | 66.5% | parliament.uk |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
parliament.uk acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while weforum.org relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — weforum.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while parliament.uk's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Market Position
| parliament.uk | weforum.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #12.5K | #34.0K | parliament.uk |
| Category Rank | #8 | #33 | parliament.uk |
parliament.uk only
weforum.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: parliament.uk could expand into Germany, Canada, while weforum.org could target France, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •parliament.uk receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than weforum.org (5.0M vs 2.1M).
- •weforum.org is growing faster (-6%) but visitors stay 1.9x shorter (1m02s vs 1m59s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •parliament.uk acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while weforum.org relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — weforum.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while parliament.uk's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •parliament.uk receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than weforum.org (5.0M vs 2.1M).
- •parliament.uk keeps visitors significantly longer (1m59s avg session vs weforum.org's 1m02s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 10 keywords (20% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026