paulgraham.com vs thehackernews.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.1M | 3.1M | thehackernews.com |
| Bounce Rate | 53.5% | 9.0% | thehackernews.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 10m | 15y 10m | paulgraham.com |
thehackernews.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while paulgraham.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.1M | 3.1M | thehackernews.com |
| MoM Change | -12% | +10% | thehackernews.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m25s | 4m44s | thehackernews.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 2.0 | paulgraham.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
paulgraham.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 1.1M monthly visits. thehackernews.com's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 45% | Direct 48% | |
| Bounce Rate | 53.5% | 9.0% | thehackernews.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 67%
| Keyword | Volume | paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| hackernews | 145.9K | #8 | #2 |
| hacknews | 4.2K | #8 | #2 |
| hacker new | 2.9K | #8 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
paulgraham.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while thehackernews.com relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — thehackernews.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while thehackernews.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 10m | 15y 10m | paulgraham.com |
| Registered | Oct 1998 | Oct 2010 | |
| Expires | Oct 2026 | Oct 2034 |
Business Maturity · Insight
paulgraham.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| paulgraham.com | thehackernews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #59.8K | #40.0K | thehackernews.com |
| Category Rank | #1.0K | #60 | thehackernews.com |
paulgraham.com only
thehackernews.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: paulgraham.com could expand into Philippines, China, while thehackernews.com could target Kazakhstan, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •paulgraham.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 1.1M monthly visits. thehackernews.com's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •paulgraham.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while thehackernews.com relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — thehackernews.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while thehackernews.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •thehackernews.com receives 2.9x more monthly traffic than paulgraham.com (3.1M vs 1.1M).
- •thehackernews.com is growing (+10%) while paulgraham.com is declining (-12%).
- •thehackernews.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m44s avg session vs paulgraham.com's 1m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •thehackernews.com has a 44 percentage point lower bounce rate (9% vs 53%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026