pdf.io vs pdfcandy.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| pdf.io | pdfcandy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.1M | 2.2M | pdfcandy.com |
| Bounce Rate | 51.8% | 32.9% | pdfcandy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 27 | 35 | pdfcandy.com |
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 10y 6m | pdf.io |
pdfcandy.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while pdf.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| pdf.io | pdfcandy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.1M | 2.2M | pdfcandy.com |
| MoM Change | +0% | -9% | pdf.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m17s | 2m09s | pdfcandy.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 3.0 | pdfcandy.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
pdf.io is growing faster (+0%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (1m17s vs 2m09s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| pdf.io | pdfcandy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 53% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.8% | 32.9% | pdfcandy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 27 | 35 | pdfcandy.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 27%
| Keyword | Volume | pdf.io | pdfcandy.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| конвертировать пдф в ворд | 48.0K | #8 | #6 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
pdf.io acquires users primarily through Direct (53%), while pdfcandy.com relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — pdf.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while pdfcandy.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| pdf.io | pdfcandy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 10y 6m | pdf.io |
| Registered | Jul 2015 | Feb 2016 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Feb 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
pdf.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| pdf.io | pdfcandy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #62.7K | #26.7K | pdfcandy.com |
| Category Rank | #242 | #96 | pdfcandy.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 1 |
pdf.io only
pdfcandy.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: pdf.io could expand into Indonesia, while pdfcandy.com could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •pdfcandy.com receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than pdf.io (2.2M vs 1.1M).
- •pdf.io is growing faster (+0%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (1m17s vs 2m09s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •pdf.io acquires users primarily through Direct (53%), while pdfcandy.com relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — pdf.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while pdfcandy.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •pdfcandy.com receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than pdf.io (2.2M vs 1.1M).
- •pdfcandy.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m09s avg session vs pdf.io's 1m17s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •pdfcandy.com has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (33% vs 52%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026