poly.ai vs poly.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| poly.ai | poly.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 274.6K | 58.2K | poly.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 42.7% | 39.4% | poly.app |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 10m | poly.ai |
poly.ai leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while poly.app leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| poly.ai | poly.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 274.6K | 58.2K | poly.ai |
| MoM Change | +8% | -3% | poly.ai |
| Avg. Session | 0m36s | 0m15s | poly.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 1.7 | poly.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
poly.app is losing traffic (-3%) despite 58.2K monthly visits. poly.ai's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| poly.ai | poly.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 61% | Direct 66% | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.7% | 39.4% | poly.app |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | poly.ai | poly.app |
|---|---|---|---|
| poly.ia | 2.3K | #1 | #8 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
poly.ai acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while poly.app relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — poly.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while poly.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| poly.ai | poly.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 10m | poly.ai |
| Registered | Dec 2017 | Nov 2023 | |
| Expires | May 2030 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
poly.ai has a 6-year head start, but poly.app's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| poly.ai | poly.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #164.0K | #642.7K | poly.ai |
| Category Rank | #1.5K | #5.8K | poly.ai |
poly.ai only
poly.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: poly.ai could expand into Russia, Spain, while poly.app could target United Kingdom, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •poly.app is losing traffic (-3%) despite 58.2K monthly visits. poly.ai's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •poly.ai acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while poly.app relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — poly.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while poly.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •poly.ai receives 4.7x more monthly traffic than poly.app (274.6K vs 58.2K).
- •poly.ai is growing (+8%) while poly.app is declining (-3%).
- •poly.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (0m36s avg session vs poly.app's 0m15s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •poly.ai acquires traffic primarily through Search (61%), while poly.app relies on Direct (66%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026