progameguides.com vs radiotimes.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| progameguides.com | radiotimes.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 14.1M | radiotimes.com |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 60.7% | radiotimes.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 9y 1m | 27y 4m | radiotimes.com |
radiotimes.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while progameguides.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| progameguides.com | radiotimes.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 14.1M | radiotimes.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | +6% | radiotimes.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m11s | 1m01s | progameguides.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 1.9 | radiotimes.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
progameguides.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. radiotimes.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| progameguides.com | radiotimes.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 80% | Search 58% | |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 60.7% | radiotimes.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
progameguides.com acquires users primarily through Search (80%), while radiotimes.com relies on Search (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — radiotimes.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while progameguides.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| progameguides.com | radiotimes.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 1m | 27y 4m | radiotimes.com |
| Registered | Aug 2017 | Apr 1999 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
radiotimes.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| progameguides.com | radiotimes.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #19.5K | #5.3K | radiotimes.com |
| Category Rank | #445 | #15 | radiotimes.com |
progameguides.com only
radiotimes.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: progameguides.com could expand into United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, while radiotimes.com could target Vietnam, Russia, Thailand.
Key Takeaways
- •progameguides.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. radiotimes.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •progameguides.com acquires users primarily through Search (80%), while radiotimes.com relies on Search (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — radiotimes.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while progameguides.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •radiotimes.com receives 3.3x more monthly traffic than progameguides.com (14.1M vs 4.2M).
- •radiotimes.com is growing (+6%) while progameguides.com is declining (-2%).
- •radiotimes.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (61% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 13 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026