qdrant.io vs qdrant.tech
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| qdrant.io | qdrant.tech | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 162.4K | 310.5K | qdrant.tech |
| Bounce Rate | 31.7% | 50.4% | qdrant.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | qdrant.io |
| Domain Age | 5y 3m | — |
qdrant.io leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while qdrant.tech leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| qdrant.io | qdrant.tech | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 162.4K | 310.5K | qdrant.tech |
| MoM Change | -3% | +0% | qdrant.tech |
| Avg. Session | 3m20s | 1m13s | qdrant.io |
| Pages / Visit | 8.9 | 1.8 | qdrant.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qdrant.tech receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than qdrant.io (310.5K vs 162.4K).
Acquisition Strategy
| qdrant.io | qdrant.tech | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.7% | 50.4% | qdrant.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | qdrant.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | qdrant.io | qdrant.tech |
|---|---|---|---|
| qdrant | 73.6K | #7 | #1 |
| qdrant cloud | 2.2K | #1 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
qdrant.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while qdrant.tech relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qdrant.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qdrant.tech's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| qdrant.io | qdrant.tech | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 5y 3m | — | |
| Registered | May 2021 | — | |
| Expires | May 2026 | — |
Market Position
| qdrant.io | qdrant.tech | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #162.3K | #175.1K | qdrant.io |
| Category Rank | #935 | #1.7K | qdrant.io |
| PH Upvotes | — | 19 |
qdrant.io only
qdrant.tech only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: qdrant.io could expand into China, while qdrant.tech could target Poland.
Key Takeaways
- •qdrant.tech receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than qdrant.io (310.5K vs 162.4K).
- •qdrant.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while qdrant.tech relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qdrant.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qdrant.tech's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •qdrant.tech has 1.9x more traffic (310.5K vs 162.4K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •qdrant.io keeps visitors significantly longer (3m20s avg session vs qdrant.tech's 1m13s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •qdrant.io has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (32% vs 50%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •qdrant.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (62%), while qdrant.tech relies on Search (62%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026