qiita.com vs runoob.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| qiita.com | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.5M | 2.6M | qiita.com |
| Bounce Rate | 65.5% | 55.1% | runoob.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 15y 1m | 11y 2m | qiita.com |
qiita.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while runoob.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| qiita.com | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.5M | 2.6M | qiita.com |
| MoM Change | -10% | +7% | runoob.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m30s | 3m07s | runoob.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 2.6 | runoob.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qiita.com is losing traffic (-10%) despite 8.5M monthly visits. runoob.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| qiita.com | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 72% | Search 63% | |
| Bounce Rate | 65.5% | 55.1% | runoob.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 500%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
qiita.com acquires users primarily through Search (72%), while runoob.com relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — runoob.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qiita.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| qiita.com | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 15y 1m | 11y 2m | qiita.com |
| Registered | Jul 2011 | Jun 2015 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
qiita.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| qiita.com | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.0K | #25.6K | qiita.com |
| Category Rank | #23 | — |
qiita.com only
runoob.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: qiita.com could expand into Hong Kong SAR China, Taiwan, Singapore, while runoob.com could target Japan, South Korea, India.
Key Takeaways
- •qiita.com is losing traffic (-10%) despite 8.5M monthly visits. runoob.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •qiita.com acquires users primarily through Search (72%), while runoob.com relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — runoob.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qiita.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •qiita.com receives 3.3x more monthly traffic than runoob.com (8.5M vs 2.6M).
- •runoob.com is growing (+7%) while qiita.com is declining (-10%).
- •runoob.com has a 10 percentage point lower bounce rate (55% vs 65%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 50 keywords (500% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026