runcell.dev vs streamlit.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| runcell.dev | streamlit.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 170.0K | 4.2M | streamlit.app |
| Bounce Rate | 44.9% | 55.1% | runcell.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 6y 4m | streamlit.app |
streamlit.app leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while runcell.dev leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| runcell.dev | streamlit.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 170.0K | 4.2M | streamlit.app |
| MoM Change | +7% | -2% | runcell.dev |
| Avg. Session | 0m45s | 3m41s | streamlit.app |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 2.8 | streamlit.app |
Growth Momentum · Insight
runcell.dev is growing faster (+7%) but visitors stay 4.9x shorter (0m45s vs 3m41s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| runcell.dev | streamlit.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 73% | Direct 76% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.9% | 55.1% | runcell.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 233%
| Keyword | Volume | runcell.dev | streamlit.app |
|---|---|---|---|
| token counter | 31.8K | #7 | #2 |
| token calculator | 7.7K | #8 | #3 |
| token count | 3.4K | #10 | #2 |
| tokens counter | 1.3K | #5 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
runcell.dev acquires users primarily through Search (73%), while streamlit.app relies on Direct (76%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — streamlit.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runcell.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| runcell.dev | streamlit.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 6y 4m | streamlit.app |
| Registered | Jun 2025 | Apr 2020 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Apr 2032 |
Business Maturity · Insight
streamlit.app has a 5-year head start, but runcell.dev's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| runcell.dev | streamlit.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #279.5K | #16.2K | streamlit.app |
| Category Rank | #6.3K | #17 | streamlit.app |
| PH Upvotes | — | 101 |
runcell.dev only
streamlit.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: runcell.dev could expand into United Kingdom, Nepal, while streamlit.app could target Germany, Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •streamlit.app is losing traffic (-2%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. runcell.dev's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •runcell.dev is growing faster (+7%) but visitors stay 4.9x shorter (0m45s vs 3m41s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •runcell.dev acquires users primarily through Search (73%), while streamlit.app relies on Direct (76%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — streamlit.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runcell.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •streamlit.app receives 24.7x more monthly traffic than runcell.dev (4.2M vs 170.0K).
- •runcell.dev is growing (+7%) while streamlit.app is declining (-2%).
- •streamlit.app keeps visitors significantly longer (3m41s avg session vs runcell.dev's 0m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026