scamadviser.com vs scamdoc.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| scamadviser.com | scamdoc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.9M | 691.2K | scamadviser.com |
| Bounce Rate | 49.7% | 47.9% | scamdoc.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 15y 2m | 8y 9m | scamadviser.com |
scamadviser.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while scamdoc.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| scamadviser.com | scamdoc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.9M | 691.2K | scamadviser.com |
| MoM Change | +11% | -12% | scamadviser.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m47s | 0m24s | scamadviser.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 1.7 | scamadviser.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
scamdoc.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 691.2K monthly visits. scamadviser.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| scamadviser.com | scamdoc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 74% | Search 70% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.7% | 47.9% | scamdoc.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
scamadviser.com acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while scamdoc.com relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scamdoc.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scamadviser.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| scamadviser.com | scamdoc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 15y 2m | 8y 9m | scamadviser.com |
| Registered | Jul 2011 | Nov 2017 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Nov 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
scamadviser.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| scamadviser.com | scamdoc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.2K | #90.1K | scamadviser.com |
| Category Rank | #203 | #89 | scamdoc.com |
scamadviser.com only
scamdoc.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: scamadviser.com could expand into France, Belgium, Spain, while scamdoc.com could target India, United Kingdom, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •scamdoc.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 691.2K monthly visits. scamadviser.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •scamadviser.com acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while scamdoc.com relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scamdoc.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scamadviser.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •scamadviser.com receives 7.1x more monthly traffic than scamdoc.com (4.9M vs 691.2K).
- •scamadviser.com is growing (+11%) while scamdoc.com is declining (-12%).
- •scamadviser.com keeps visitors significantly longer (0m47s avg session vs scamdoc.com's 0m24s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026