shorturl.at vs tiny.cc
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| shorturl.at | tiny.cc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.2M | 2.1M | shorturl.at |
| Bounce Rate | 55.3% | 70.9% | shorturl.at |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | shorturl.at |
| Domain Age | — | 20y 5m |
shorturl.at leads in 3 of 3 dimensions, while tiny.cc leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| shorturl.at | tiny.cc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.2M | 2.1M | shorturl.at |
| MoM Change | -9% | +8% | tiny.cc |
| Avg. Session | 1m11s | 0m39s | shorturl.at |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 1.6 | shorturl.at |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tiny.cc is growing faster (+8%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m39s vs 1m11s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| shorturl.at | tiny.cc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 44% | Direct 56% | |
| Bounce Rate | 55.3% | 70.9% | shorturl.at |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | shorturl.at |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 76%
| Keyword | Volume | shorturl.at | tiny.cc |
|---|---|---|---|
| short url | 150.7K | #1 | #7 |
| shorten url | 141.3K | #1 | #9 |
| short link | 65.0K | #1 | #8 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
shorturl.at acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while tiny.cc relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tiny.cc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while shorturl.at's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| shorturl.at | tiny.cc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 20y 5m | |
| Registered | — | Mar 2006 | |
| Expires | — | Mar 2027 |
Market Position
| shorturl.at | tiny.cc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #10.5K | #34.7K | shorturl.at |
| Category Rank | #83 | #234 | shorturl.at |
| PH Upvotes | 13 | — |
shorturl.at only
tiny.cc only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: shorturl.at could expand into Canada, Vietnam, Germany, while tiny.cc could target India, Pakistan, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •shorturl.at is losing traffic (-9%) despite 7.2M monthly visits. tiny.cc's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •tiny.cc is growing faster (+8%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m39s vs 1m11s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •shorturl.at acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while tiny.cc relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tiny.cc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while shorturl.at's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •shorturl.at receives 3.4x more monthly traffic than tiny.cc (7.2M vs 2.1M).
- •tiny.cc is growing (+8%) while shorturl.at is declining (-9%).
- •shorturl.at keeps visitors significantly longer (1m11s avg session vs tiny.cc's 0m39s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026