skywork.ai vs terabox.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| skywork.ai | terabox.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.6M | 7.0M | terabox.com |
| Bounce Rate | 43.5% | 40.3% | terabox.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 3y 9m | 18y 1m | terabox.com |
terabox.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while skywork.ai leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| skywork.ai | terabox.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.6M | 7.0M | terabox.com |
| MoM Change | -15% | +7% | terabox.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m09s | 3m25s | terabox.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.1 | 5.0 | terabox.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
skywork.ai is losing traffic (-15%) despite 2.6M monthly visits. terabox.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| skywork.ai | terabox.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 69% | Direct 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.5% | 40.3% | terabox.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 112%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
skywork.ai acquires users primarily through Search (69%), while terabox.com relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — terabox.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while skywork.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| skywork.ai | terabox.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 9m | 18y 1m | terabox.com |
| Registered | Nov 2022 | Jul 2008 | |
| Expires | Nov 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
terabox.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| skywork.ai | terabox.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #22.5K | #6.8K | terabox.com |
| Category Rank | #229 | #18 | terabox.com |
| PH Upvotes | 93 | — |
skywork.ai only
terabox.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: skywork.ai could expand into Indonesia, Vietnam, while terabox.com could target South Korea, Peru.
Key Takeaways
- •skywork.ai is losing traffic (-15%) despite 2.6M monthly visits. terabox.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •skywork.ai acquires users primarily through Search (69%), while terabox.com relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — terabox.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while skywork.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •terabox.com receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than skywork.ai (7.0M vs 2.6M).
- •terabox.com is growing (+7%) while skywork.ai is declining (-15%).
- •skywork.ai acquires traffic primarily through Search (69%), while terabox.com relies on Direct (52%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 37 keywords (112% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026