subeasy.ai vs wave.video
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| subeasy.ai | wave.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 530.3K | 448.5K | subeasy.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 44.8% | 45.6% | subeasy.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | subeasy.ai |
| Domain Age | 2y 3m | 8y 11m | wave.video |
subeasy.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while wave.video leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| subeasy.ai | wave.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 530.3K | 448.5K | subeasy.ai |
| MoM Change | +13% | -5% | subeasy.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m25s | 0m42s | subeasy.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.2 | 1.9 | subeasy.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
wave.video is losing traffic (-5%) despite 448.5K monthly visits. subeasy.ai's +13% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| subeasy.ai | wave.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 62% | Search 50% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.8% | 45.6% | subeasy.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | subeasy.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | subeasy.ai | wave.video |
|---|---|---|---|
| instagram to mp4 | 132.3K | #7 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
subeasy.ai acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while wave.video relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wave.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while subeasy.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| subeasy.ai | wave.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 3m | 8y 11m | wave.video |
| Registered | May 2024 | Oct 2017 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Oct 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
wave.video has a 7-year head start, but subeasy.ai's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| subeasy.ai | wave.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #101.6K | #123.1K | subeasy.ai |
| Category Rank | #54 | #968 | subeasy.ai |
subeasy.ai only
wave.video only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: subeasy.ai could expand into France, United Kingdom, Indonesia, while wave.video could target Spain, Taiwan, Mexico.
Key Takeaways
- •wave.video is losing traffic (-5%) despite 448.5K monthly visits. subeasy.ai's +13% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •subeasy.ai acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while wave.video relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wave.video's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while subeasy.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •subeasy.ai is growing (+13%) while wave.video is declining (-5%).
- •subeasy.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (1m25s avg session vs wave.video's 0m42s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •wave.video has a 7-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026