submagic.co vs tikvid.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| submagic.co | tikvid.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 856.8K | 3.5M | tikvid.io |
| Bounce Rate | 35.9% | 57.4% | submagic.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | submagic.co |
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 4y 1m | tikvid.io |
submagic.co leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while tikvid.io leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| submagic.co | tikvid.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 856.8K | 3.5M | tikvid.io |
| MoM Change | -6% | -18% | submagic.co |
| Avg. Session | 4m06s | 2m54s | submagic.co |
| Pages / Visit | 4.2 | 3.3 | submagic.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tikvid.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than submagic.co (3.5M vs 856.8K).
Acquisition Strategy
| submagic.co | tikvid.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 51% | Search 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.9% | 57.4% | submagic.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | submagic.co |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 59%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
submagic.co acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while tikvid.io relies on Search (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — submagic.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tikvid.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| submagic.co | tikvid.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 4y 1m | tikvid.io |
| Registered | Mar 2023 | Jul 2022 | |
| Expires | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
tikvid.io has been in the market 1 years longer (4y vs 3y). tikvid.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while submagic.co's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| submagic.co | tikvid.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #54.2K | #17.7K | tikvid.io |
| Category Rank | #25 | #7 | tikvid.io |
| PH Upvotes | 153 | — |
submagic.co only
tikvid.io only
Market Position · Insight
tikvid.io is heavily concentrated in Peru (86%), creating dependency risk on a single market. submagic.co has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: submagic.co could expand into Peru, Vietnam, Singapore, while tikvid.io could target India, France, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •tikvid.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than submagic.co (3.5M vs 856.8K).
- •submagic.co acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while tikvid.io relies on Search (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — submagic.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tikvid.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •tikvid.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than submagic.co (3.5M vs 856.8K).
- •submagic.co has a 22 percentage point lower bounce rate (36% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •submagic.co acquires traffic primarily through Direct (51%), while tikvid.io relies on Search (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 24 keywords (59% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026