submagic.co vs ttsave.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| submagic.co | ttsave.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 856.8K | 425.3K | submagic.co |
| Bounce Rate | 35.9% | 37.7% | submagic.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 29 | submagic.co |
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 5y 1m | ttsave.app |
submagic.co leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while ttsave.app leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| submagic.co | ttsave.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 856.8K | 425.3K | submagic.co |
| MoM Change | -6% | -59% | submagic.co |
| Avg. Session | 4m06s | 0m44s | submagic.co |
| Pages / Visit | 4.2 | 2.5 | submagic.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
submagic.co receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than ttsave.app (856.8K vs 425.3K).
Acquisition Strategy
| submagic.co | ttsave.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 51% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.9% | 37.7% | submagic.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 29 | submagic.co |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 21%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
submagic.co acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while ttsave.app relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — submagic.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ttsave.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| submagic.co | ttsave.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 5y 1m | ttsave.app |
| Registered | Mar 2023 | Jul 2021 | |
| Expires | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ttsave.app has been in the market 2 years longer (5y vs 3y). ttsave.app's longer track record suggests established operations, while submagic.co's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| submagic.co | ttsave.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #54.2K | #116.1K | submagic.co |
| Category Rank | #25 | #193 | submagic.co |
| PH Upvotes | 153 | — |
submagic.co only
ttsave.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: submagic.co could expand into Indonesia, Germany, Türkiye, while ttsave.app could target India, Brazil, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •submagic.co receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than ttsave.app (856.8K vs 425.3K).
- •submagic.co acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while ttsave.app relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — submagic.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ttsave.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •submagic.co receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than ttsave.app (856.8K vs 425.3K).
- •submagic.co keeps visitors significantly longer (4m06s avg session vs ttsave.app's 0m44s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •submagic.co acquires traffic primarily through Direct (51%), while ttsave.app relies on Search (62%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 11 keywords (21% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026