SuperX vs uptodown.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| SuperX | uptodown.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 130.1K | 75.2M | uptodown.com |
| Bounce Rate | 43.4% | 39.7% | uptodown.com |
| Est. MRR | $21.1K | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | SuperX |
| Domain Age | 2y 2m | 23y 8m | uptodown.com |
uptodown.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while SuperX leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| SuperX | uptodown.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 130.1K | 75.2M | uptodown.com |
| MoM Change | +71% | +9% | SuperX |
| Avg. Session | 1m23s | 2m23s | uptodown.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 3.1 | uptodown.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
SuperX is growing faster (+71%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (1m23s vs 2m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| SuperX | uptodown.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 55% | Search 73% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.4% | 39.7% | uptodown.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | SuperX |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
SuperX acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while uptodown.com relies on Search (73%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — SuperX's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while uptodown.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| SuperX | uptodown.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | $21.1K | — | |
| Revenue / Visit | $0.162 | — | |
| Domain Age | 2y 2m | 23y 8m | uptodown.com |
| Registered | Jun 2024 | Dec 2002 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Jun 2033 |
Business Maturity · Insight
SuperX has reached $21.1K MRR in 2 years while uptodown.com shows no public revenue data after 24 years — suggesting different monetization maturity or disclosure strategies.
Market Position
| SuperX | uptodown.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #297.0K | #601 | uptodown.com |
| Category Rank | #842 | #16 | uptodown.com |
| PH Upvotes | 929 | 6 | SuperX |
SuperX only
uptodown.com only
Market Position · Insight
SuperX is heavily concentrated in United States (63%), creating dependency risk on a single market. uptodown.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: SuperX could expand into Brazil, Russia, Egypt, while uptodown.com could target Canada, Australia, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •SuperX is growing +71% while uptodown.com grows +9%. At current trajectory, SuperX could close the traffic gap within 11 months.
- •SuperX is growing faster (+71%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (1m23s vs 2m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •SuperX acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while uptodown.com relies on Search (73%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — SuperX's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while uptodown.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •uptodown.com receives 578.3x more monthly traffic than SuperX (75.2M vs 130.1K).
- •Both are growing, with SuperX accelerating faster at +71% vs +9%.
- •uptodown.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m23s avg session vs SuperX's 1m23s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026