translate.com vs translate.video
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| translate.com | translate.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 42.6K | translate.com |
| Bounce Rate | 56.9% | 38.3% | translate.video |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | translate.video |
| Domain Age | 27y 6m | 5y 7m | translate.com |
translate.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while translate.video leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| translate.com | translate.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 42.6K | translate.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | +16% | translate.video |
| Avg. Session | 0m28s | 0m15s | translate.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 2.3 | translate.video |
Growth Momentum · Insight
translate.video is growing faster (+16%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m15s vs 0m28s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| translate.com | translate.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 62% | Search 60% | |
| Bounce Rate | 56.9% | 38.3% | translate.video |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | translate.video |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
translate.com acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while translate.video relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — translate.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while translate.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| translate.com | translate.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 6m | 5y 7m | translate.com |
| Registered | Feb 1999 | Jan 2021 | |
| Expires | Feb 2029 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
translate.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| translate.com | translate.video | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #55.8K | #721.5K | translate.com |
| Category Rank | #592 | #9.7K | translate.com |
translate.com only
translate.video only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: translate.com could expand into Pakistan, Cambodia, Uzbekistan, while translate.video could target United Kingdom, South Africa, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •translate.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.3M monthly visits. translate.video's +16% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •translate.video is growing faster (+16%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m15s vs 0m28s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •translate.com acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while translate.video relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — translate.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while translate.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •translate.com receives 30.2x more monthly traffic than translate.video (1.3M vs 42.6K).
- •translate.video is growing (+16%) while translate.com is declining (-6%).
- •translate.com keeps visitors significantly longer (0m28s avg session vs translate.video's 0m15s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026