ytdown.to vs ytsave.to

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

ytdown.to

ytsave.to

	ytdown.to	ytsave.to	Leads
Monthly Visits	41.4M	1.5M	ytdown.to
Bounce Rate	27.4%	64.0%	ytdown.to
SEO & Keywords	30	30	Tie
Domain Age	1y 7m	11m	ytdown.to

ytdown.to leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while ytsave.to leads in 0.

Growth Momentum

ytdown.toytsave.to

	ytdown.to	ytsave.to	Leads
Monthly Visits	41.4M	1.5M	ytdown.to
MoM Change	+0%	+87%	ytsave.to
Avg. Session	3m34s	3m40s	ytsave.to
Pages / Visit	5.8	2.3	ytdown.to

Growth Momentum · Insight

ytdown.to receives 28.0x more monthly traffic than ytsave.to (41.4M vs 1.5M).

Acquisition Strategy

	ytdown.to	ytsave.to	Leads
Primary Channel	Search 56%	Search 64%
Bounce Rate	27.4%	64.0%	ytdown.to
SEO & Keywords	30	30	—

ytdown.to

Search 56%Direct 27%Social 14%Referral 2%

ytsave.to

Search 64%Direct 17%Social 17%Referral 2%

SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail

ytdown.to OnlySharedytsave.to Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 67%

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

ytdown.to acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while ytsave.to relies on Search (64%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ytdown.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ytsave.to's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

	ytdown.to	ytsave.to	Leads
Domain Age	1y 7m	11m	ytdown.to
Registered	Jan 2025	Oct 2025
Expires	Jan 2032	Oct 2030

Business Maturity · Insight

Both are relatively new entrants in this market.

Market Position

	ytdown.to	ytsave.to	Leads
Global Rank	#924	#51.4K	ytdown.to
Category Rank	#1	#15	ytdown.to

ytdown.toytsave.to

🇺🇸 United States

19%

🇮🇩 Indonesia

ytdown.to only

🇧🇷 Brazil 13%🇮🇳 India 5%🌐 Pakistan 4%

ytsave.to only

🌐 Vietnam 97%🇸🇬 Singapore 0%🇬🇧 United Kingdom 0%

Market Position · Insight

ytsave.to is heavily concentrated in Vietnam (97%), creating dependency risk on a single market. ytdown.to has a more diversified audience.

Each has untapped markets the other serves: ytdown.to could expand into Vietnam, Singapore, United Kingdom, while ytsave.to could target Brazil, India, Pakistan.

Key Takeaways

•ytdown.to receives 28.0x more monthly traffic than ytsave.to (41.4M vs 1.5M).
•ytdown.to acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while ytsave.to relies on Search (64%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ytdown.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ytsave.to's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
•ytdown.to receives 28.0x more monthly traffic than ytsave.to (41.4M vs 1.5M).
•ytdown.to has a 37 percentage point lower bounce rate (27% vs 64%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
•They share 24 keywords (67% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
•ytsave.to depends on a single country for 97% of traffic, while ytdown.to is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.