amazon.jobs vs reuters.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
amazon.jobs| amazon.jobs | reuters.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 13.1M | 73.2M | reuters.com |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 62.2% | amazon.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 20y 11m | 33y 3m | reuters.com |
reuters.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while amazon.jobs leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| amazon.jobs | reuters.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 13.1M | 73.2M | reuters.com |
| MoM Change | +9% | +5% | amazon.jobs |
| Avg. Session | 3m40s | 1m20s | amazon.jobs |
| Pages / Visit | 5.0 | 1.8 | amazon.jobs |
Growth Momentum · Insight
reuters.com receives 5.6x more monthly traffic than amazon.jobs (73.2M vs 13.1M).
Acquisition Strategy
| amazon.jobs | reuters.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 38% | Direct 48% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 62.2% | amazon.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 13%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
amazon.jobs acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while reuters.com relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — reuters.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while reuters.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| amazon.jobs | reuters.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 20y 11m | 33y 3m | reuters.com |
| Registered | Sep 2005 | Jun 1993 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
reuters.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| amazon.jobs | reuters.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #3.6K | #913 | reuters.com |
| Category Rank | #18 | #30 | amazon.jobs |
amazon.jobs only
reuters.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: amazon.jobs could expand into Japan, while reuters.com could target Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •reuters.com receives 5.6x more monthly traffic than amazon.jobs (73.2M vs 13.1M).
- •amazon.jobs acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while reuters.com relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — reuters.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while reuters.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •reuters.com receives 5.6x more monthly traffic than amazon.jobs (73.2M vs 13.1M).
- •amazon.jobs keeps visitors significantly longer (3m40s avg session vs reuters.com's 1m20s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •amazon.jobs has a 27 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 62%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 7 keywords (13% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026