archive-it.org vs archive.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| archive-it.org | archive.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 445.8K | 193.9K | archive-it.org |
| Bounce Rate | 46.5% | 44.6% | archive.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | archive.com |
| Domain Age | 21y 3m | 27y 10m | archive.com |
archive.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while archive-it.org leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| archive-it.org | archive.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 445.8K | 193.9K | archive-it.org |
| MoM Change | +9% | -12% | archive-it.org |
| Avg. Session | 0m35s | 0m17s | archive-it.org |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 1.5 | archive-it.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
archive.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 193.9K monthly visits. archive-it.org's +9% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| archive-it.org | archive.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 61% | Direct 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 46.5% | 44.6% | archive.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | archive.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 210%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
archive-it.org acquires users primarily through Direct (61%), while archive.com relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — archive.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while archive.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| archive-it.org | archive.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 21y 3m | 27y 10m | archive.com |
| Registered | Jun 2005 | Nov 1998 | |
| Expires | Jun 2028 | Dec 2034 |
Business Maturity · Insight
archive.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| archive-it.org | archive.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #109.9K | #262.5K | archive-it.org |
| Category Rank | #1.3K | #508 | archive.com |
archive-it.org only
archive.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: archive-it.org could expand into India, Vietnam, Nigeria, while archive.com could target Russia, Canada, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •archive.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 193.9K monthly visits. archive-it.org's +9% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •archive-it.org acquires users primarily through Direct (61%), while archive.com relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — archive.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while archive.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •archive-it.org receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than archive.com (445.8K vs 193.9K).
- •archive-it.org is growing (+9%) while archive.com is declining (-12%).
- •archive-it.org keeps visitors significantly longer (0m35s avg session vs archive.com's 0m17s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 44 keywords (210% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026