archive.com vs foreplay.co
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| archive.com | foreplay.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 193.9K | 485.7K | foreplay.co |
| Bounce Rate | 44.6% | 41.6% | foreplay.co |
| Domain Rating | — | 67 | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 29 | archive.com |
| Domain Age | 27y 10m | 16y 1m | archive.com |
archive.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while foreplay.co leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| archive.com | foreplay.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 193.9K | 485.7K | foreplay.co |
| MoM Change | -12% | +1% | foreplay.co |
| Avg. Session | 0m17s | 2m52s | foreplay.co |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 3.0 | foreplay.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
archive.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 193.9K monthly visits. foreplay.co's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| archive.com | foreplay.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 69% | Direct 66% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.6% | 41.6% | foreplay.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 29 | archive.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
archive.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while foreplay.co relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — archive.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while archive.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| archive.com | foreplay.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 10m | 16y 1m | archive.com |
| Registered | Nov 1998 | Jul 2010 | |
| Expires | Dec 2034 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
archive.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| archive.com | foreplay.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | — | 67 | |
| Global Rank | #262.5K | #101.2K | foreplay.co |
| Category Rank | #508 | #528 | archive.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 126 |
archive.com only
foreplay.co only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: archive.com could expand into Australia, Germany, while foreplay.co could target Vietnam, Nigeria.
Key Takeaways
- •archive.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 193.9K monthly visits. foreplay.co's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •archive.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while foreplay.co relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — archive.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while archive.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •foreplay.co receives 2.5x more monthly traffic than archive.com (485.7K vs 193.9K).
- •foreplay.co is growing (+1%) while archive.com is declining (-12%).
- •foreplay.co keeps visitors significantly longer (2m52s avg session vs archive.com's 0m17s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 14 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026