awork.com vs teamwork.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| awork.com | teamwork.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 324.2K | 3.0M | teamwork.com |
| Bounce Rate | 27.4% | 23.9% | teamwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 4m | 31y 5m | teamwork.com |
teamwork.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while awork.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| awork.com | teamwork.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 324.2K | 3.0M | teamwork.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | -6% | awork.com |
| Avg. Session | 7m03s | 12m53s | teamwork.com |
| Pages / Visit | 6.0 | 10.0 | teamwork.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
teamwork.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than awork.com (3.0M vs 324.2K).
Acquisition Strategy
| awork.com | teamwork.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 76% | Direct 80% | |
| Bounce Rate | 27.4% | 23.9% | teamwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 216%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
awork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while teamwork.com relies on Direct (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — teamwork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while awork.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| awork.com | teamwork.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 4m | 31y 5m | teamwork.com |
| Registered | Apr 1999 | Mar 1995 | |
| Expires | Apr 2026 | Mar 2032 |
Business Maturity · Insight
teamwork.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| awork.com | teamwork.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #120.2K | #15.8K | teamwork.com |
| Category Rank | #13 | #166 | awork.com |
awork.com only
teamwork.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: awork.com could expand into United States, Philippines, Canada, while teamwork.com could target Germany, Switzerland, Austria.
Key Takeaways
- •teamwork.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than awork.com (3.0M vs 324.2K).
- •awork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while teamwork.com relies on Direct (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — teamwork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while awork.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •teamwork.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than awork.com (3.0M vs 324.2K).
- •teamwork.com keeps visitors significantly longer (12m53s avg session vs awork.com's 7m03s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 41 keywords (216% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •teamwork.com has a 4-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026