teamwork.com vs wrike.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| teamwork.com | wrike.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 5.1M | wrike.com |
| Bounce Rate | 23.9% | 24.9% | teamwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 5m | 20y 10m | teamwork.com |
teamwork.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while wrike.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| teamwork.com | wrike.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 5.1M | wrike.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | +3% | wrike.com |
| Avg. Session | 12m53s | 13m21s | wrike.com |
| Pages / Visit | 10.0 | 7.3 | teamwork.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
teamwork.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 3.0M monthly visits. wrike.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| teamwork.com | wrike.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 80% | Direct 80% | |
| Bounce Rate | 23.9% | 24.9% | teamwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 43%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
teamwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (80%), while wrike.com relies on Direct (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wrike.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wrike.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| teamwork.com | wrike.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 5m | 20y 10m | teamwork.com |
| Registered | Mar 1995 | Oct 2005 | |
| Expires | Mar 2032 | Oct 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
teamwork.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| teamwork.com | wrike.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #15.8K | #10.4K | wrike.com |
| Category Rank | #166 | #106 | wrike.com |
teamwork.com only
wrike.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: teamwork.com could expand into Japan, Brazil, while wrike.com could target United Kingdom, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •teamwork.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 3.0M monthly visits. wrike.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •teamwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (80%), while wrike.com relies on Direct (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wrike.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wrike.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •wrike.com has 1.7x more traffic (5.1M vs 3.0M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •wrike.com is growing (+3%) while teamwork.com is declining (-6%).
- •They share 18 keywords (43% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •teamwork.com has a 11-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026