bubble.io vs medo.dev
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bubble.io | medo.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 208.4K | bubble.io |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 29.4% | medo.dev |
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | bubble.io |
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 10m | bubble.io |
bubble.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while medo.dev leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| bubble.io | medo.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 208.4K | bubble.io |
| MoM Change | -17% | -9% | medo.dev |
| Avg. Session | 10m49s | 7m09s | bubble.io |
| Pages / Visit | 16.0 | 6.2 | bubble.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
bubble.io receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than medo.dev (2.0M vs 208.4K).
Acquisition Strategy
| bubble.io | medo.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Direct 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 29.4% | medo.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | bubble.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while medo.dev relies on Direct (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while medo.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bubble.io | medo.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 10m | bubble.io |
| Registered | Jan 2008 | Oct 2025 | |
| Expires | Apr 2029 | Oct 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
bubble.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| bubble.io | medo.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| Global Rank | #14.2K | #172.0K | bubble.io |
| Category Rank | #375 | #417 | bubble.io |
| PH Upvotes | 19 | 514 | medo.dev |
bubble.io only
medo.dev only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bubble.io could expand into Philippines, Azerbaijan, Egypt, while medo.dev could target Brazil, United Kingdom, France.
Key Takeaways
- •bubble.io receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than medo.dev (2.0M vs 208.4K).
- •bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while medo.dev relies on Direct (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while medo.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •bubble.io receives 9.7x more monthly traffic than medo.dev (2.0M vs 208.4K).
- •bubble.io keeps visitors significantly longer (10m49s avg session vs medo.dev's 7m09s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 12 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •bubble.io has 1.8x more ranking keywords (35 vs 20), indicating broader SEO footprint.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026