bubble.io vs rocket.new
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bubble.io | rocket.new | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 919.3K | bubble.io |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 43.0% | bubble.io |
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | bubble.io |
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 1y 5m | bubble.io |
bubble.io leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while rocket.new leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| bubble.io | rocket.new | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 919.3K | bubble.io |
| MoM Change | -17% | +48% | rocket.new |
| Avg. Session | 10m49s | 4m32s | bubble.io |
| Pages / Visit | 16.0 | 8.5 | bubble.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
rocket.new is growing faster (+48%) but visitors stay 2.4x shorter (4m32s vs 10m49s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| bubble.io | rocket.new | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Search 45% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 43.0% | bubble.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | bubble.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 76%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while rocket.new relies on Search (45%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rocket.new's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bubble.io | rocket.new | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 1y 5m | bubble.io |
| Registered | Jan 2008 | Apr 2025 | |
| Expires | Apr 2029 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
bubble.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| bubble.io | rocket.new | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| Global Rank | #14.2K | #37.5K | bubble.io |
| Category Rank | #375 | #125 | rocket.new |
| PH Upvotes | 19 | — |
bubble.io only
rocket.new only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bubble.io could expand into Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, while rocket.new could target Brazil, United Kingdom, France.
Key Takeaways
- •bubble.io is losing traffic (-17%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. rocket.new's +48% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •rocket.new is growing faster (+48%) but visitors stay 2.4x shorter (4m32s vs 10m49s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while rocket.new relies on Search (45%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rocket.new's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •bubble.io receives 2.2x more monthly traffic than rocket.new (2.0M vs 919.3K).
- •rocket.new is growing (+48%) while bubble.io is declining (-17%).
- •bubble.io keeps visitors significantly longer (10m49s avg session vs rocket.new's 4m32s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026