bunkr-albums.io vs shapes.inc
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bunkr-albums.io | shapes.inc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 1.3M | bunkr-albums.io |
| Bounce Rate | 62.2% | 45.3% | shapes.inc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 3y 3m | 2y 12m | bunkr-albums.io |
bunkr-albums.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while shapes.inc leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| bunkr-albums.io | shapes.inc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 1.3M | bunkr-albums.io |
| MoM Change | -53% | +24% | shapes.inc |
| Avg. Session | 1m00s | 3m37s | shapes.inc |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 5.7 | shapes.inc |
Growth Momentum · Insight
bunkr-albums.io is losing traffic (-53%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. shapes.inc's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| bunkr-albums.io | shapes.inc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 31% | Search 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 62.2% | 45.3% | shapes.inc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bunkr-albums.io acquires users primarily through Direct (31%), while shapes.inc relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — shapes.inc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while shapes.inc's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bunkr-albums.io | shapes.inc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 3m | 2y 12m | bunkr-albums.io |
| Registered | May 2023 | Sep 2023 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
bunkr-albums.io has been in the market 0 years longer (3y vs 3y). bunkr-albums.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while shapes.inc's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| bunkr-albums.io | shapes.inc | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #31.8K | #33.2K | bunkr-albums.io |
| Category Rank | #1.6K | #788 | shapes.inc |
| PH Upvotes | — | 3 |
bunkr-albums.io only
shapes.inc only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bunkr-albums.io could expand into Spain, India, Vietnam, while shapes.inc could target France, Russia, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •bunkr-albums.io is losing traffic (-53%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. shapes.inc's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •bunkr-albums.io acquires users primarily through Direct (31%), while shapes.inc relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — shapes.inc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while shapes.inc's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •bunkr-albums.io has 1.9x more traffic (2.4M vs 1.3M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •shapes.inc is growing (+24%) while bunkr-albums.io is declining (-53%).
- •shapes.inc keeps visitors significantly longer (3m37s avg session vs bunkr-albums.io's 1m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •shapes.inc has a 17 percentage point lower bounce rate (45% vs 62%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026