shapes.inc vs sigmabrowser.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| shapes.inc | sigmabrowser.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 719.1K | shapes.inc |
| Bounce Rate | 45.3% | 46.1% | shapes.inc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 34 | sigmabrowser.com |
| Domain Age | 2y 12m | 2y 3m | shapes.inc |
shapes.inc leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while sigmabrowser.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| shapes.inc | sigmabrowser.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 719.1K | shapes.inc |
| MoM Change | +24% | +87% | sigmabrowser.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m37s | 1m37s | shapes.inc |
| Pages / Visit | 5.7 | 3.0 | shapes.inc |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sigmabrowser.com is growing faster (+87%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (1m37s vs 3m37s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| shapes.inc | sigmabrowser.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 47% | Search 71% | |
| Bounce Rate | 45.3% | 46.1% | shapes.inc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 34 | sigmabrowser.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 23%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
shapes.inc acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while sigmabrowser.com relies on Search (71%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — shapes.inc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sigmabrowser.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| shapes.inc | sigmabrowser.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 12m | 2y 3m | shapes.inc |
| Registered | Sep 2023 | May 2024 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
shapes.inc has been in the market 1 years longer (3y vs 2y). shapes.inc's longer track record suggests established operations, while sigmabrowser.com's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| shapes.inc | sigmabrowser.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #33.2K | #68.5K | shapes.inc |
| Category Rank | #788 | #1.0K | shapes.inc |
| PH Upvotes | 3 | — |
shapes.inc only
sigmabrowser.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: shapes.inc could expand into Canada, United Kingdom, while sigmabrowser.com could target Spain, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •sigmabrowser.com is growing +87% while shapes.inc grows +24%. At current trajectory, sigmabrowser.com could close the traffic gap within 2 months.
- •sigmabrowser.com is growing faster (+87%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (1m37s vs 3m37s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •shapes.inc acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while sigmabrowser.com relies on Search (71%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — shapes.inc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sigmabrowser.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •shapes.inc has 1.8x more traffic (1.3M vs 719.1K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •Both are growing, with sigmabrowser.com accelerating faster at +87% vs +24%.
- •shapes.inc keeps visitors significantly longer (3m37s avg session vs sigmabrowser.com's 1m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026