career.io vs laborfinders.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| career.io | laborfinders.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 283.4K | 154.8K | career.io |
| Bounce Rate | 42.6% | 37.8% | laborfinders.com |
| Domain Rating | 75 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 30 | career.io |
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 30y 9m | laborfinders.com |
career.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while laborfinders.com leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| career.io | laborfinders.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 283.4K | 154.8K | career.io |
| MoM Change | +9% | +6% | career.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m31s | 2m37s | laborfinders.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.6 | 5.4 | laborfinders.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
career.io receives 1.8x more monthly traffic than laborfinders.com (283.4K vs 154.8K).
Acquisition Strategy
| career.io | laborfinders.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 71% | Search 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.6% | 37.8% | laborfinders.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 30 | career.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 8%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
career.io acquires users primarily through Search (71%), while laborfinders.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — laborfinders.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while career.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| career.io | laborfinders.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 30y 9m | laborfinders.com |
| Registered | Jan 2008 | Nov 1995 | |
| Expires | Apr 2028 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
laborfinders.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| career.io | laborfinders.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 75 | — | |
| Global Rank | #141.6K | #196.1K | career.io |
| Category Rank | #601 | #612 | career.io |
| PH Upvotes | 10 | — |
career.io only
laborfinders.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: career.io could expand into Pakistan, while laborfinders.com could target Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •career.io receives 1.8x more monthly traffic than laborfinders.com (283.4K vs 154.8K).
- •career.io acquires users primarily through Search (71%), while laborfinders.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — laborfinders.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while career.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •career.io has 1.8x more traffic (283.4K vs 154.8K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •laborfinders.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m37s avg session vs career.io's 1m31s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •With only 8% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •laborfinders.com has a 12-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026